Scottsdale Summertime Sizzle

All over the country

The summer’s long since begun

Everybody’s engaged

Having fun in the sun

But it’s different for us

Our summer’s extreme

We hide from the rays

Of the sun’s scorching beam

The snowbirds can’t take it

They leave during May

As the mercury rises

The heat sends them away

The sun rises early

Triple digits – the norm

Out in the desert

It’s exceptionally warm

“But it’s a dry heat,” you’ll hear

Don’t believe that big lie

During monsoon

Our humidity’s high

I’ve often wondered

With our intense heat

If we actually could

Fry an egg on the street

It wouldn’t surprise me

Things here get quite hot

Like the inside of your car

When parked out in a lot

Metal will burn you

Watch that seatbelt

If you leave something inside

It will definitely melt

Do not clasp the wheel

Or your skin you will sear

Guide with your pinkies

That’s how we steer

And when watering plants

Everyone knows

The water is hot

When it comes from the hose

Speaking of water

Go nowhere without it

Or risk dehydration

There’s no doubt about it

The desert is rugged

A brutal place to be

If not for the comfort

Of good ol’ A/C

All around town

Thermostats are set low

So you must bring a sweater

Wherever you go

This is no joke

I’m certainly not teasing

I tell you the truth

Places are freezing

To combat the heat

It’s what we must do

Until fall comes our way

And summer is through

When the rest of the country

Heads back inside

We’ll pay no attention

We’re staying outside

Most of the year

Our weather’s quite lovely

And really there’s no place

That I’d rather be

Sweatin’ it out – for now,

 ~ M.

Wait! I might need that.

What is it about human nature that makes us want what we can't have?  You know what I'm talking about – we all go through it. 

It sometimes starts as early as grade school – that's when I first noticed it – but when I really think about it, it probably starts even earlier than that.  Have you ever seen a few toddlers playing together?  They're not really playing together; they're basically playing by themselves in the company of others.  One may be enthralled with his own toes while one shakes a small stuffed animal and another simply gnaws on a Lincoln Log.  Here's where the trouble comes in.  One of them notices a blanket or a squishy ball nearby, whatever it is, that's been sitting there unused and as soon as one of them goes for that object, the others immediately want it.  Why is that?  Well, the answer is simple.  They think they're missing out on something.  The toes – all ten of them mind you, the lambie and the slimy wooden dowel no longer hold any appeal, whatever that other kid has holds all the interest.  Some people never outgrow this.  It's called Keeping up with the Joneses, but that's a little different from what I'm actually getting at here.

I noticed this trait in myself in 7^th Grade.  There was a boy who was, well… let's just say he wasn't really in the cool crowd.  He was really in a click of his own – alone in the click of his own – he's probably a millionaire today, but this is a story about when he was 12.  He spent a lot of time with me, as I did him.  He was funny.  It wasn't until my friends started to tease me about it that it became a problem:  so-and-so likes you… he's weird… why does he hold your feet?  (Yes, he did.  I don't know why.  He'd grab them from the seat behind me.  As I think back on it now, the question I have is not why did he do it, but how did he do it?  How long were that kid's arms?)  Anyway, all the teasing was too much for me.  I was embarrassed.  So, I made it clear that although I liked him, I didn't like him like that and I wanted him to leave me alone.  This could be where I made my mistake in life.  He took it like a man and stopped showering me with attention. 

Now here's the thing.  Even though he stopped – which is what I wanted – once he did, I missed it.  Not only did I miss it, I actually wondered why he didn't like me anymore.  So I got what I wanted, but once I did, I missed what I gave up. 

Well, I'm not 12 anymore but I do still carry a sense of, 'wait, I might want that,' and it dawns on me now that, possibly, it could be traced back to this very episode.  Could be, but probably not, right?  It's like I said earlier, this is inherent in human nature.

I think it's this trait – I may want this in the future – that plagues hoarders.  I could be wrong (I am so often).  Hoarding probably has deeper psychological roots than this.  I've mentioned before that I'm too neat and tidy to be a hoarder, but I do have more than a few things in my home that I know I will never use but will not discard – heck, I still have one unpacked box in my garage and I moved almost a decade ago. 

I have a rack to place inside my dryer for when I'm drying sneakers.  Never used it. 

I've kept the washing machine tub stabilizers since the day my washer was delivered.  The stabilizers are used when moving the unit.  I don't plan on moving any time soon and if I did, I likely wouldn't take the washer with me – and let's say, for sake of argument, I did take it, I'm sure I wouldn't figure out how to secure the concrete encased tub (front loader) with these stabilizers anyway, so why do I keep them?  Well, I might need them someday.

I have casters for my patio grill – which is hard-wired into a natural gas line.  This thing can never be on wheels and yet…

My living room ceiling fans work by wall switches and/or remote control.  Even though I use the wall switches, in my garage sits a box that contains all the accessories to convert the fans to be operable with pull chains.  Pull chains.  These things are mounted on 12' ceilings.  No one is ever going to pull anything – they're out of reach; but you never know, so.  The remotes, by the way, sit unused in a drawer.  Did I mention I use the wall switches? 

Also in the garage is a rear compartment security screen for my Santa Fe.  I took this out about 5 years ago to make room for something and there it sits.  It was unused while it was in the vehicle and certainly remains unused as it sits idly up against a wall.  

So what's the deal?  Why keep these things?  It's not like saving miscellaneous hardware (I have a cabinet in the laundry room filled with fasteners, cables, clamps, wires, items of all variety that I may actually use someday for a home repair or quick fix – at least that's what I tell myself.), or books (which I have begun to pass on) or even buttons (most new clothing comes with an extra button and not only do I save those, I've actually used them).  So why don't I get up right now and grab the dryer rack, tub stabilizers, grill casters, ceiling fan accessories and the Hyundai screen and chuck them all?  I don't know.  I just can't seem to do it – you know, I may need them someday. 

~ M.

Brushstrokes

Years ago I completed a seminar series.  Although there were a lot of different takes on what the series was actually about or designed to do, I clearly saw its focus being on communication; and in order to be a more effective communicator, you'd need to understand how it is that you communicate.  Are you yawning already?  I know… seminars are like that.

 

Anyway, one of the exercises we did to help identify how we operate within our community was a drawing.  Not a Rembrandt drawing or even a Picasso – no, these were more like Pictionary sketches.  Many drew ponds, some drew the ocean.  In these pictures, the world the communicator lived in was the body of water and they, along with everyone they interacted with, were fish.  There were work fish, friend fish, fish from religious institutions, some school fish (no pun), kid fish, sports fish, family fish – you get it, right?  They were all represented by fish swimming in the same water.  In a similar vein, there was one in which the 'world' was a marina and all the people boats.  I also remember a galaxy (obviously drawn by a broad thinker) where all the people were stars.

 

I drew an artist's palette.  My palette held lots of colorful paint blobs.  Like the fish, I had blue friends, green work associates, purple church folk, yellow family members and so on.  Here's what I found interesting.  I didn't include myself on the palette.  There wasn't a red paint blob for me – there wasn't any paint blob for me.  I was the paint brush beside the palette.  I found this fascinating because this is exactly how I tend to operate in life.  Dab a little here, dab a little there, then sit off to the side – by myself.

 

I spend a lot of time alone – now more than ever.  I go hiking alone (although I interact with all the regulars I see up there), I work alone (however I'm on the phone quite a bit interacting with my customers) and I live alone (but I interact heavily with my surrounding family.  Side note:  Often when leaving my brother's house, as I announce my departure he counters with, "Alright, you stayed your hour.")  The simple fact is this, I am not uncomfortable by myself – and that's what was so psychologically revealing about my drawing.  I do realize that this sets me apart from many.

 

Another thing they shared with us was a story (I think this is actually a book) about 'the dash.'  I've written about this before, but simply put, the dash represents our entire lives.  If you look at a headstone you'll see the name of the deceased along with two dates: born this day – died this day.  Whoever that person was, whatever they did and whatever impact their life had on this world, it's all right there in that tiny dash.

 

I think the real beauty in life – although this can be bittersweet – is that we don't really know the full impact of our dashes.  I think of my paintbrush – the tip of which that has touched so many lives.  And I think of Roy Lichtenstein, too.  For those not familiar with this artist, some of his works were giant graphic novel type frames, painted pixel by pixel, where if you're right up against it, all you'd see are circles and dots, but step back a few feet, and then you see the actual picture – and no longer see the dots.  I think this is what it's like for life's big picture.

 

It's like Clarence (Oddbody, AS2) told George Bailey in It's a Wonderful Life, "Each man's life touches so many other lives."  And this is the bittersweet part.  We just don't know what mark we're leaving on others, but I know this much, it should be positive. 

 

So, what kind of dots are you making?  What do your brushstrokes say about you? 

 

~ M.

 

Mercy Pledge

♪ When the Left loves Obama

Can't keep their minds on nothin' else

He'd change our world

Turn it upside down

 

He is bad, they can't see it

He can do no wrong

Turn his back on our allies

And put them down

 

The Left loves Obama

Spendin' our very last dime

Debt in the trillions, we don't need

Givin' up all our freedom

We'll be out in the rain

In his mind that's the way it ought to be

 

When the Left loves Obama

Deep down in their souls

They know he'll bring such misery

He plays them for fools

They'll be the last to know

Lovin' eyes can't ever see ♪

 

The following poem is more like a plea for mercy…

 

Who is this guy

With the radical friends?

His policies may be

A means to our end

 

The economy's dreadful

And that is a fact

Just like his Affordable

Healthcare Act

 

We need someone who'll govern

And put the country first

If we don't make a change now

We're in for the worst

 

Energy costs skyrocket

And 'necessarily' soar

Gas prices like Europe

Is what we're headed for

 

Shutting down coal plants

And restrictions on drilling

Push his agenda

Which I'm sure he finds thrilling

 

He's paving the way

For green technology

Promoting solar and wind power

And pond scum algae

 

Billions of dollars

Have been funneled this way

Companies go bankrupt

And he has nothing to say

 

Our economy's anemic

There hasn't been a recovery

With ATMs and kiosks

How could there be?

 

Plus what he inherited

From Bush 43…

Is the blame game getting old –

Or is it just me?

 

Unemployment is high

Our debt soars through the roof

It's time for a change

Do we need any more proof?

 

This man talks

From both sides of his mouth

Reading from Teleprompters

As our country goes south

 

His apology tour

Was an abomination

The USA

Is the world's greatest nation

 

The apologies which are necessary

And quite overdue

Are the ones, Sir, which should be

Directly from you

 

You've insulted the Israelis

And sent Churchill home in a crate

Then condescendingly told others

"They punch above their weight."

 

You're disingenuous Mr. President

The hot-mike gaffes prove it

And what is it, exactly,

"To Vladimir, I transmit."?

 

And what's with the urging

To tone down the rhetoric?

The huge double standard

Is making me sick

 

The Left can say anything

It seems that's your position

But the Right must be silenced

Kill opposition

 

Answering to no one

He sits at the top

But if you ask me

This guy's a flop

 

The class warfare game

Fills folks with hate

We'd better wake up

Before it's too late

 

Are we better off now

Than four years ago?

If one's to be honest

The answer is NO.

 

With the road that we're on

I don't know how we'll survive

There'll be no turning back

We must elect 45

 

Into politics

I don't like to delve

But I say, "ABO

In 2012"

 

Just a concerned citizen from one of our 50 (not 57) states –

~ M.

 

This is Madness

I'm sure you're familiar with the term kindred spirits.  It's often used to describe like-minded people who come in contact with one another.  Likewise, I'm sure you're familiar with the term mind reader, as well.  So, here's my question.  If someone is stating my thoughts on a topic, are they reading my mind or are they just a kindred spirit – one who has had such a similar experience as mine so that it appears as though they are reading my mind?  And what if the person stating those thoughts did so in a magazine article that I would read well after it was initially written?  In that instance, I don't see how 'mind reader' could really apply.  But how can it be that another person would know so well such personal thoughts?  Wasn't I the only one who felt this way?  As is so often the answer to that question, guess not.

 

Under the "Life Lessons" section of Real Simple's March issue, author Elizabeth Berg wrote a piece titled "Beautiful, in Every Single Way."  Remember that Real Simple is written for women.  Dealing with body parts that bedevil us, she wrote specifically about her long time insecurity regarding her 'problem area.'  I'm sure as you read that you immediately thought of your problem area, that's what I did.  The thing is her area and my area, well... it's the same area – the belly, or as she called it, the pooch.  UGH!  

 

Pooch?  When not speaking of puppy dogs, is this even really a word? Pooch?  I don't know, it sounds a little too marsupial for me.  Sac?  No, that's not right.  Disgusting wad of fat?  More to the point, but I guess we'll stick with pooch. 

 

So, it doesn't take a genius to read between these lines.  I have a personal pooch problem.  (gotta love alliteration).  I was so moved by her article – see, misery really does love company – and how I related to what she wrote, I felt compelled to share my own thoughts on the fatty roll that's plagued me for years.    

 

Ms. Berg wrote that when she notices a woman with a similar figure, she imagines mentally high-fiving her.  I can affirm the sense of kinship, although I never felt like hand slapping a fellow afflicted.  My mental response has always been an image of a tender empathetic hug.  Either way, we both understand what life is like for women with this unfortunate body type. 

 

Her belly history began around 8 years old.  I was about 10.  I was swimming with a friend who suggested I may want to wear a one-piece swim suit.  Huh?  As my friend gestured to her flat stomach, I looked at mine – it jiggled over the top of my bikini bottoms.  It was the first time I even noticed my belly.  It was the last time I wore a two-piece.  Ten is too young an age to be introduced to the term adipose tissue (my mom was a nurse).  In many ways that was the end of my innocence.

 

As I matured, my legs grew more than my body.  At 5'-7", my inseam is nearly 3 feet.  Although people always say, "Oh, what nice long legs you have," what they don't realize is that being short-waisted makes the belly problem that much worse.  In fact, it's probably the main reason for the belly problem in the first place.  But a little height, long legs and thin arms do help to mask the bane of my existence.

 

In the article, the author wrote of an intimate bath she had taken with a boyfriend while in her 20s.  The parallels were unbelievable.  When I was in my 20s, I had an experience similar to her bathtub episode.  After a romantic interlude, as I laid in the arms of the love of my life (or so I thought), while he gently caressed my arm, he said, "You know, if it wasn't for your belly, you'd have a perfect body."  He wasn't being malicious, just matter-of-fact.  Can you imagine?  I think I responded meekly with, "Oh, um, thanks… I guess."

 

Originally from the East coast, I've lived in Scottsdale, AZ for 8 years now.  I don't even notice it anymore, but when I first moved here, it seemed as if there was a physical correction center on every street corner – you know, plastic surgery facilities, medi-spas and cosmetic dentistry, you name it, it's here. If one is plagued by physical imperfection or a… deformity, this is the place to be if you want to get it taken care of.  The interesting thing is that the inundation of "we can fix you" places had just the opposite effect for me.  I was appalled at the barrage of messages (primarily geared toward women, I'm sure) saying that we weren't good enough.  That's madness.  We're fine.  We're all just fine.

 

Until this article, I sort of lost touch with all my belly-induced self-loathing.  It was almost bizarre reading her words.  How could this be?  How could this woman know my feelings and experiences, especially about something so personal?  Amazing.  Or is it?  Maybe we're not so different after all.  I don't think it matters if we're talking about arms, thighs, butts or bellies.  We all have something that bothers us.  But it's never really about what's on the outside, is it?  Elizabeth learned that by things she saw with a friend of hers and her mom.  She loves them for who they are – their issues have no impact on how she feels about them – and it's that realization that brought her to terms with her own issue. I get that.

 

I'm 47 now and, boy, my little 10-year-old self had no idea what was in store.  Hair grays, skin gets loose and triceps flap – and it's no big deal, not really.  I can't say that I'm happy about it, but it is okay because, after all, we're all just fine.

 

From the sisterhood,

 

~ M.

 

 

It's a Many-Splendored Thing...

At least according to Old Blue Eyes it is – and he's right, it is. I'm taking about love, of course.

February is a time when we're inundated with sparkly hearts and diaper-clad creatures beckoning the purchase of flowers and chocolate to help us demonstrate our love for others. Almost simultaneously, as the last few Christmas items get marked down 75% or more, out come the Valentine's Day decorations. I suppose we have the card companies to thank; but I feel, like the holiday, the word itself has been a little overplayed.

Love, as most people know, is commonly defined as a "strong affection or liking for someone or something." True enough… concise… right to the point. I don't think anyone would argue with that definition – I wouldn't. So, why is it, then, it often seems trite when the word is used? Maybe it's just simply because we use it all the time for everything.

Mick Jagger loved living. He found it easy to do. I'm sure there are those who'd beg to differ, but that's a different story. My sister Laura loved that song. I think it's alright, I guess – doesn't really do much for me. And that's the point. Love is different for everyone.

There are songs that we love

And movies and books

Some love to dine out

While some love to cook

Some love food spicy

Some tart or sweet

Others love veggies

Still others love meat

Some love things salty

Others love sweet

Some love the cold

And some love the heat

There are those who love puzzles

And those who love games

Some love watching TV

Some read when it rains

Some love sports

In fact, many do

They love the game

And the players, too

Some love to exercise

Some love to relax

Some love trivia

Supported by facts

Some love to window shop

Some love to buy

Some love the train

And some love to fly

Some love to travel

Some love to stay home

Some love to text

Some talk on the phone

Some love their pets

While some love their toys

Some love the quiet

And some love the noise

Some love poetry

Others love prose

Some love the daisy

And some love the rose

Love's different for everyone

That's plain to see

It's different for you

And it's different for me

There's conditional love

That comes with its strings

But it's untethered love

That's the best of all things

Love makes you sing

And love makes you dance

Let love fill your heart

Let's give love a chance

True love's all that matters

In the grand scheme of things

There's a difference it makes

In the joy that it brings

So let's be kind

And love one another

Father, mother

Sister, brother

What you've done in the end

Whether big, whether small

If not for love

It won't matter at all

Hoping it matters,

~ M.

Tergiversate

As some of you may know, tergiversate was the 2011 Word of the Year.  For those who didn't know, it was – at least according to Dictionary.com, anyway.  Not familiar with the word that won the top spot, I had to look it up.  It's a verb.  Ter-JIV-er-sate: to repeatedly change one's attitude or opinions (i.e. flip-flopping).  Given what's going on in the political world today, it seems apropos.  I believe one of the runners-up in this annual word contest was austerity, by the way.  See what I mean?  Apropos. 

 

Politicians are always accused of saying one thing and doing another, changing their positions – flip-flopping, as it were – or, dare I say, tergiversating.  There, I said it.  (You know, I never thought I'd actually use this word.)  Are they really flip-flopping, though? Or, is it more likely that over time their positions naturally change?  If you believe in a candidate and support their views – which may be different from those previously held – then they've evolved; but if you don't, they're spineless flip-floppers with no convictions.  Personally, I tend to support the former half of this statement.

 

Let's look at some issues.  How about Global Warming.  Even the die-hard Global Warming enthusiasts have softened somewhat on this issue – don't they call it Climate Change now?  That aside, when this first came up, you could see the potential merit.  We'd been polluting the land and water, jets have been contaminating the skies and we've been to outer space where we've left behind debris (yes, we've littered on the moon!).  None of this is good – common sense would tell you that.  So you can see how someone could quickly get on board the go-green-and-take-care-of-the-environment train.  And while good stewardship of the planet and recycling materials just makes sense, I still don't totally buy the whole Green initiative.  Take electric cars.  (Chevy Volt anyone?)  As one comedian once said, "Where do you think electricity comes from, jelly beans?"  There's a bigger agenda behind Green Technology.  If this were a crime-themed plot (and I'm not saying it's not), the detectives would be following the money trail.  Maybe we should worry less about those who've changed their position on the severity of this issue and look to see who's actually driving this train.

 

How about this dicey topic. Roe vs. Wade.  (Gasp)  This is a big one, I know. I will tell you when I was younger, I considered myself Pro Choice – which is not to say that I was pro abortion.  I just felt that a woman should have the right to make that decision for herself and the federal government shouldn't have a say.  For me, it was about taking away a right we currently had – it's always hard to take back – and I bought into the brainwashing or… the glossing over of the real issue.  See, when this is discussed, it's often spoken of as a condition.  The condition, of course, is pregnancy.  Should a woman have the right to terminate her present condition, pregnancy?  I don't know how much support this issue would have if the question was, "Should a woman have the right to kill a baby?"  This is the point Pro Lifers have been trying to make for years.  I know this raises all sorts of questions on when is it actually a baby, and I don't have the answer to that; what I do know is that since abortion is legal and, therefore, a viable option to those who find themselves with an unwanted pregnancy (see, condition again – no mention of baby), it's been completely abused.  Do you know that according to Planned Parenthood statistics (parenthood - anyone see the irony here?) they typically abort over 300,000 babies a year?  This figure does not include abortions done at private institutions.  And what's worse (as if it could get any worse) is that the tax-payers (you and me) help pay for it.  Yeah, Planned Parenthood is subsidized with our tax money and that is just wrong.  Why should the federal government be involved in this otherwise personal situation?  The fact of the matter is this program makes it too easy for irresponsible people to have irresponsible sex and act irresponsibly thereafter.  Abortion is not a quick fix.  If it were illegal, would we have women wildly horseback riding and jumping out of trees hoping to induce miscarriages?  Maybe, but the one sure thing is that the number of terminated pregnancies would drop dramatically if abortion wasn't so readily available.  So what's my position now that I'm a little older?  I can't really be Pro Choice anymore since that is, in essence, pro abortion, so I'm Pro Life.  If that makes me a flip-flopper, so be it.

 

On a lighter note, let's look at the issue of spending.  My father always told me to put away some of my paycheck each week into a savings account.  "Make paying yourself the same as paying a creditor," he'd say.  I didn't listen.  Youth, as they say, is wasted on the young.  When you're in your 20s and the money is flowing (or in Congress with a surplus) and there's not only clothes, but shoes to be had, who puts money away for a rainy day?  Back in the 80s no one paid heed to the term fiscal responsibility.  Again, with a little age comes wisdom.  I am not irresponsible with money now.  I do not spend it frivolously.  I live well within my means – in fact, I may actually be living below my means.  I wish I had been more responsible with my money sooner.  What's important, though, is that I am responsible now.  I recognized the error of my ways and made the necessary changes for my future.  Did I cut back on some things?  Yes, of course.  Am I better off today because of it? Absolutely.  Does that mean my attitude regarding spending has changed?  Hey, if the shoe fits…

 

Changes of opinions are not necessarily flip-flops.  Many of them are based on continuing education, maturity and growth.  Years ago, one of my favorite bands began to change their style.  Sometime around Abacab or shortly thereafter, Genesis went down more of a 'pop' path than they had been known for.  When asked about this, Phil Collins said, and I'm paraphrasing here, "As you grow, you don't read the same types of books, do you?  See the same types of movies?  Or even eat the same foods?  So why should we play the same type of music?"  Their change in style saddened me at the time, but he has a point, doesn't he?  Why shouldn't we change our minds, attitudes and opinions on things as we grow?  It's natural.  Think about this, if we didn't, we'd all still be playing with LEGOs and eating Pez.

 

Ever-evolving,

~ M.